Author

Abstract

It is impossible for any individual of people to belong to one type of ethnicity, doctrine, language or religion. Mostly it carries a social variety. This case can be clearly seen in complex societies which need to include all its individuals for the sake of overcoming the obstacles that may be appeared because of authority administration. This situation requires us to determine the extent to which Islamic law is able to adjust with contemporary regulations in achieving coexistence among followers of religions. Searching into organizing and functional aspects of authority in Islam is an essential element of analyzing the means of adoptability and development according to general changes.The study aims at determining the suitable shape for administrating pluralistic society of cults to fulfil stability, integrity and unity.The methodology of the study is based on theoretical-analytical approach in addition to references of some experiences followed across Islamic history where there is a mixture between induction and elicitation. The data has been gathered depending on scientific observation. The sample of the study is represented by choosing two modern systems for administrating a pluralistic society, that is, harmonization and federation. In conclusion, the researcher arrived at a group of results. The most prominent ones are the adjustable system or harmonization is better than federation in administrating such society to achieve coexistence for transitional period and then move to live together. The federal system does not guarantee the unity of nation because of the ability of social interference. Moreover, the policy of rule in Islam is characterized by flexibility because there are no final judgements which deal with the mechanics of establishing authority and its functions. The common interests represent a legitimate basis for adaptability with the modern systems when unity is in danger of disintegration. The researcher arrived at a group of recommendations. One of these recommendations is the invitation of politician to adopt intermediary solutions which allow minorities to participate in administration to achieve trust. Secondly, we suggest setting up a special council which represents religious communities in pluralistic society to ensure participation especially in issues related to its social and cultural affairs.

Keywords