Abstract

The research aims to structurally investigate the request method (style) contained in the verses of conspiracy in the Holy Quran to explain the distinctive use of this method in the Quran. Undoubtedly, the use of this method in the Holy Quran is quite different from the use of speakers of the language in all ages.
The study was limited to two sets of the request method: (the imperative and the present tense verbs coupled with the prohibitive (not)), these two styles represent two Arabic sentence structures and also two of the classical Arab methods, through which the reader (the receiver) realizes the meaning of what the sentence meaning is, as their structure differs from the rest of the request sentences. The imperative is issued by a superordinate while prohibition is a request issued by the superordinate to cease doing an action. The research has also addressed the semantic differences between the request methods and the conjunctions used in some verses as (fa and thumma), also the positions of the omitted pronouns in the verses under investigation were highlighted and the linguistic, rhetorical and phonological significance of this omission was explained. We have also touched upon the disagreement and dispute among grammarians and readers.
In conclusion, it is highly recommended that it is necessary in any interpretation of a verse from the Holy Quran to consider the verse construction consisting of verbs, nouns and conjunctions as they have semantic value that can alter the meaning of the verse. Also, in reading, interpreting and studying a verse, the preceding and following verses must be considered as the verse is part of a text that cannot be isolated from it.

Keywords